Watch. Weigh. Decide.

Every story has another side.

Follow the story beyond the first wave. Watch what happened, weigh the evidence, and decide for yourself.

WatchSee the story. WeighTest the evidence. DecideMake up your own mind.
One standard: evidence
  • Original context
  • Supporting viewpoint
  • Opposing viewpoint
  • Linked sources

Monthly search watch

What America Is Searching

A monthly editorial look at the questions, names, events, and ideas gaining attention—expanded with context, sources, and related viewpoints.

Explore the trends

What the numbers mean: Search interest measures attention, not truth, approval, importance, or public opinion. MyControversy adds editorial context before drawing conclusions.

See it. Source it. Size it up.

Current controversies

View all
Your first controversy will appear here.

Add original context, sources, and more than one viewpoint before publishing.

Two sides. One standard: evidence.

Hear the strongest case from both sides.

We separate verified facts, claims, analysis, and opinion so readers can make up their own minds.

See both sides →
POINTThe supporting argument and its best evidence.
COUNTERPOINTThe opposing argument and its best evidence.
Attention is not truth.

Why we're drawn to controversy

Conflict does not make a claim true. But research helps explain why disagreement, negative information, and moral emotion capture attention and travel so quickly.

01

Bad information weighs more

A major review found that negative events and information often have a stronger psychological impact than comparable positive ones.

Read the study →
02

Negative news activates us

A cross-national experiment found an average physiological negativity bias in responses to television news, while also documenting meaningful individual differences.

Read the study →
03

Moral emotion travels

In a large analysis of polarizing debates on social media, moral-emotional language was associated with wider sharing, especially within ideological groups.

Read the study →
04

Feedback can amplify outrage

Research on social learning found that positive feedback for outrage predicted more outrage expression later, showing how platform rewards can shape behavior.

Read the study →

Our takeaway: attention is a starting point, not a verdict. MyControversy uses that attention to slow the story down, identify evidence, and show more than one viewpoint.

Explore the full research library →

Watch it. Question it. Discuss it.

Latest videos

View all
Your first video will appear here.

Add original context, source credit, and your commentary before publishing.

Watch. Wonder. Share.

Did that just happen?

Unexpected moments, incredible footage, and stories worth sharing.

View all
Your first lighter-side feature will appear here.

Share something unexpected, add source credit, and tell readers why it is worth watching.

Bring the story. We'll bring the sides.

Have something worth debating?

Submit a permitted video link for manual review. Nothing is posted automatically.

Read submission rules